Skip to content
Ease AI

Apps we’ve built

Six products in the market, not case studies.

This site carries no invented client stories, because unverifiable specifics are worth less than nothing. What it carries instead is this: software we designed, built and shipped, live on the public internet under its own name. Click any of them and check every claim on this page in about thirty seconds. That is the entire point of it being here. Each one lists what it does not do, too.

Verified September 21, 2026
Security tooling · live

A static analysis security scanner built specifically for AI agent codebases.

The problem

Conventional static analysis was designed before anything in your codebase could call a tool, follow an instruction embedded in fetched text, or decide to spend money. As ASIScan puts it: your SAST scanner doesn't know what a tool call is.

Why you’d use it

Because enterprise procurement now asks. Security questionnaires have grown AI-specific sections, and the honest position for most teams is that nobody can answer question 26 — walk us through your kill switch — with anything they would put in writing. ASIScan audits an agent codebase against the OWASP Top 10 for Agentic Applications, the OWASP LLM Top 10 and EU AI Act Article 50, and produces a dated report you can attach to the questionnaire instead of a paragraph of reassurance. The scanner itself is free and MIT-licensed, so finding out where you stand costs nothing but the time to run it.

Who it’s for

  • Companies shipping agent features into enterprise accounts
  • Agencies delivering agent work who need a repeatable, billable assessment
  • Teams who have been asked for AI security evidence and had nothing to send

What it does

  • 18 rules covering the ASI risks plus the overlap with the LLM Top 10
  • Detects invisible instruction smuggling — zero-width characters, bidirectional overrides, Unicode tag exploits
  • Reads TypeScript, JavaScript, Python, Go, Rust, Java, C#, PHP, JSON, YAML, TOML, shell and Dockerfiles
  • Output as terminal, markdown, JSON or SARIF 2.1.0
  • GitHub Action with pull-request gates and weekly re-scanning
  • Runs fully offline with no telemetry — nothing leaves your machine
  • Free and MIT licensed: npx asiscan .

Pricing

Scanner free and MIT licensed. Assessment $490 one-off, Continuous $2,400/year, Consultancy $6,000/year.

What it does not do

It reads source code, not runtime behaviour, IAM policies, network topology or model output. It is regex-based rather than AST-based, and its own site reports roughly 75% measured precision after tuning against fifteen open-source agent frameworks. It is not a certification, not a conformity assessment and not legal advice — which is why a 47-item manual review checklist ships alongside it.

What building it demonstrates

  • Deep familiarity with how AI systems actually fail in production
  • Tooling built to survive enterprise security review
  • A published, defensible accuracy figure rather than a marketing claim
Consumer application · live

An AI study companion for college and university students, on web, iOS and Android.

The problem

Students have no shortage of AI tools that will simply write the essay. What they lack is one that makes them understand the material — and that their institution would not treat as cheating.

Why you’d use it

It is the clearest demonstration on this site of what a full consumer product build looks like: six AI tools, three languages, native apps on both stores, per-subject billing, and guardrails designed in rather than bolted on. Acado coaches and never ghostwrites, which is a harder product to build than the alternative and the only version worth shipping into education.

Who it’s for

  • College and university students
  • High school students, including for application essays
  • Anyone studying in English, French or Spanish

What it does

  • Study Wizard — sourced explanations rather than confident guesses
  • Writing Coach — feedback on clarity, structure, grammar and argument, without ghostwriting
  • Exam Prep — practice quizzes generated from the student's own notes and syllabus
  • Course Materials — resources drawn from Khan Academy, OpenStax, MIT and Wikipedia
  • Voice input and output for hands-free study
  • Full multilingual support in English, French and Spanish
  • Native iOS and Android apps alongside the web application

Pricing

Seven-day free trial with no card required. $5.99 per subject per month, or $19.99/month unlimited ($12.99/month billed annually).

What it does not do

It is deliberately narrow. Content is restricted to education, it refuses off-topic requests, and it will not write an assignment for a student who asks it to. That is a design decision, not a gap.

What building it demonstrates

  • A complete consumer product: authentication, billing, subscriptions and two app stores
  • Safety guardrails and refusal behaviour treated as a core feature
  • Encrypted storage with row-level security across a real user base
AI workspace · live

A chat workspace that routes each question to the AI model that fits it best, across several providers, on one subscription.

The problem

Buying a capable AI assistant usually means paying full price for one company's app, even when a cheaper model would answer just as well. Teams end up juggling several subscriptions, or accepting one vendor's blind spots.

Why you’d use it

It is the tool we recommend when a business is paying for premium AI seats it barely uses. Switchboard gives access to 22 models from six AI companies under one login, picks a suitable model for each question, and shows which model answered and what it cost. Paid plans start well below a single-vendor subscription. Full disclosure: it is built and run by the same founder as Ease AI, and we say so whenever we recommend it.

Who it’s for

  • Small teams paying for several AI subscriptions
  • Professionals who want AI help with writing, research and spreadsheets without choosing a vendor
  • Developers who want to connect tools like GitHub, Supabase and Linear to an assistant

What it does

  • Automatic routing across 22 models from six AI companies
  • Shows which model answered each question and what it cost
  • Built-in spending caps
  • Read-only-by-default connections to tools such as GitHub, Supabase and Linear
  • Export answers to Word, Excel, PDF or a live web page
  • Per-provider data-handling disclosures, including training opt-out status

Pricing

Lite $4.99/month, Plus $9.99/month, Pro $19.99/month, Builder $49.99/month.

What it does not do

Voice conversation is listed on its own site as not available yet. It is a general-purpose workspace, not a tool built around one workflow, and some routing options use providers outside Canada unless you switch them off.

What building it demonstrates

  • Multi-vendor AI integration and model routing
  • Usage metering with per-answer cost shown to the user
  • Working within several providers' data and safety terms in one product
AI social posting · early access

AI-drafted social media posts that only go out after a person approves them.

The problem

Small teams want to post consistently but don't have time to write for every platform, and most automation tools either need constant hand-holding or publish without anyone checking first.

Why you’d use it

Postii drafts posts shaped for each platform, requires an approval step before anything goes live, and adds guardrails like daily caps and auto-pause when a platform pushes back. It is the pattern we use for any client automation that speaks in public on their behalf.

Who it’s for

  • Owners who handle their own marketing
  • Marketing teams that want AI drafting without unsupervised publishing
  • Agencies managing several client brands

What it does

  • Platform-specific drafting, short for X and longer for LinkedIn
  • Mandatory human approval before any post publishes
  • Scheduling with daily caps and minimum gaps between posts
  • Several brand profiles, each with its own voice and approval rules
  • Full audit log of drafts, approvals and publishes

Pricing

Free for one brand and one channel. Starter $29/month, Business $99/month, Agency $249/month, with larger plans published on the site.

What it does not do

It is in early access. Its own site lists Instagram, Facebook, Threads, Pinterest, TikTok and YouTube as still in review with those platforms, and posting to X is limited by X's free API tier.

What building it demonstrates

  • Approval and guardrail workflows around generated content
  • Publishing integrations across several platforms
  • Usage-based SaaS plans
Sports betting analytics · live

A sports betting analytics platform that compares odds from 70+ sportsbooks in real time and surfaces positive expected value plays.

The problem

Serious bettors jump between several sportsbooks to compare lines, and most tools that find value or track sharp money cost $100 a month or more.

Why you’d use it

It is our clearest example of AI and data engineering under real-time load: live odds from 70+ books, machine-learning predictions, and a composite Edge Score for every game. The same skills apply when a client needs AI working on live pricing, inventory or scheduling data rather than a static document.

Who it’s for

  • Bettors who want data rather than picks
  • People who shop lines across several sportsbooks
  • Users in the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom

What it does

  • Real-time odds comparison across 70+ sportsbooks
  • +EV scanner and arbitrage finder
  • AI predictions with a 0-100 Edge Score for each game
  • Sharp money, steam move and reverse line movement alerts
  • Kelly Criterion, parlay, hedge and other betting calculators
  • Coverage of NBA, NFL, MLB, NHL, soccer, UFC and NCAA

Pricing

Free tier available. Paid plans from $29/month, with a 7-day free trial.

What it does not do

It is an informational tool, not a sportsbook: it does not accept or place wagers and cannot guarantee outcomes. It is for users 18+ (or the local legal age) in the US, Canada and the UK, and odds refresh less often outside peak hours and on lower tiers.

What building it demonstrates

  • Real-time data pipelines across dozens of third-party sources
  • Machine-learning predictions with an explainable composite score
  • Clear responsible-use disclaimers in a regulated category
AI co-founder · private beta

A guided AI tool that walks a founder from business idea through legal setup, branding and a working website.

The problem

Starting a company means juggling incorporation, legal paperwork, a website, a CRM and branding, usually by hiring several different services or muddling through alone.

Why you’d use it

It combines a guided launch wizard, lawyer-reviewed document templates, a basic CRM, a one-page website with payments and an AI-generated brand kit in one flow. It shows how we design step-by-step workflows that take a non-technical person from zero to done.

Who it’s for

  • First-time founders in Ontario or Delaware
  • Existing businesses that need legal documents, a CRM or a website
  • Consultants who help others launch

What it does

  • Guided launch wizard for Ontario and Delaware incorporation
  • Lawyer-reviewed templates: NDA, contractor agreement, terms, privacy policy, founder agreement
  • Built-in CRM for lead capture
  • One-page website builder with payments
  • AI-generated brand kit: logo, colours and messaging

Pricing

Not published. It is currently onboarding design partners.

What it does not do

It is in private beta, limited to Canada and the United States, with a waitlist rather than open sign-up.

What building it demonstrates

  • Guided, wizard-style workflow design
  • Document generation paired with legal review
  • AI-generated branding and creative assets

What this is evidence of

The same work, pointed at your problem.

Building a product for yourself is a harder test than building one for a client. Nobody signs off a scope that lets you stop early. You own the security review, the billing edge cases, the app store rejections, the support inbox, and the model bill at the end of the month.

They share the thing this site talks about most: a record of what the AI actually did. ASIScan produces a dated report you can hand to a procurement team. Acado refuses requests it should refuse. Postii won’t publish anything a person hasn’t approved. Switchboard shows which model answered and what it cost.

If you want something of your own built to that standard, that is custom AI applications, from $20,000.

Start here

Got something you want built?

Describe it in a paragraph. I’ll tell you what it would realistically cost and take — and whether an existing tool would do the job for a fraction of it, which is often the honest answer.

How custom builds work

Tell me what you want to build

Asked so I can tell you honestly whether what you want is achievable at that number, before either of us spends time on a call.

Replies within one business day, from me directly.